Roman Architecture in Syria,How Much Roman !!?,

church of mushabbak

full text at :



Syrian* fribriuments have’ been divided into two great classes; those built before Romandominion, and those succeeding it. But it by no means follows that the advent of Roman political power meant the advent of Roman artistic supremacy. Pompey’s campaign was too hurried to be lasting even in its military results: and later we find Antony attempting to plunder Palmyra as an alien and hostile city.


The effect of Roman conquest upon the conquered territory was political reorganization. Laws and government they imposed, but religion and the arts they took unto themselves from the conquered people. It was as if the Roman obeyed literally the comman.

As Butler has said in speaking of the region of the South “What we call the ‘Roman architecture’ was not an art that was brought from overseas and transplanted in new soil, but represented the mere extension of the art of one portion of Syria to another portion from Greek Syria to Semitic Syria a process which Rome, with her wonderful power for organization and amalgamation accomplished as doubtless no otherpower could have done.”

It would be absurd enough to speak of Rome introducing forms of her art upon another, when she had received them from the common parent ; but a worse field than Syria for such a transplanting could scarcely be imagined. As Diehl has said in speaking of Syria “In spite of the profound influence exerted by Greek civilization, in spite of the long duration of Roman domination, the country had always remained ‘fort particulariste’ Assuredly the great cities, such as Antioch, had become, quickly enough, capitals of Hellenism but, beneath this veneer of Hellenism, there persisted, above all in the country, the characteristic traits of the Semitic race, so deeply impressed on their souls that Syrian Christianity took its special character from them.”

bosra unisco world heritage list

Negative criticism in itself is worthless. Therefore it has not been sufficient to show that the Syrian monuments are not Roman : the attempt has also been made to recognize those elements that are Oriental, and particularly to notice original features, such as the arched intercolumniation, which show that this Hellenism in Syria was not the last effort of a decadence, but a living growth, possessing in itself the power for further and greater development.

Attention has already been called to the fact that the Syrian architecture shows a quite different spirit from that shown in the monuments at Rome. And, as the consideration of the individual monuments will show, this is a Greek rather than Roman spirit. There are very few monuments that do not show some native or Oriental influence. This is strongest in the Hauran, owing to the

Qalat al mudiq “Apamea”

power of the Naba-taeans, and there, in one period, that of the temples at Si, its strength amounts to an almost complete eclipse

of Greek tradition.

greater handicap has been the lack of any systematic treatment of the development of Roman architecture. However, the latter can only be of use after there has been a clear recognition of the relations of the Imperial architecture to those of the countries that came under the Roman sway.

christian architecture in syria

christian architecture in syria

10 responses to “Roman Architecture in Syria,How Much Roman !!?,

  1. Great history … and pictures !! Thanks ! Do you have the name of the ‘church’ in the last picture of your post ?

  2. I all the tikme used to read piece off writing in
    news papers but noww ass I am a user of net so from now I am
    using net for content, thanks tto web.
    monday night football our

  3. 999 It’s really a cologne developed for guys somewhere between the ages of 35 and fifty three, and may be worn through the daytime. I would proceed to spend assuming that feasible chopping it up along with a fellow geek, the many even though not marketing nearly anything.
    cheap jerseys

  4. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you
    relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste
    your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving
    us something informative to read?

  5. Can I juhst say what a comfort to duscover somebody that genuinely
    understands what they are discussing on the web.
    Yoou actually know how to bring an issue to light and make it important.
    More people must read this and understand this sude of the story.
    It’s surprising you arre not more popular given that you definitely possess
    the gift.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s